Frontiers in Pharmacology (Oct 2024)
Combining mathematical modeling, in vitro data and clinical target expression to support bispecific antibody binding affinity selection: a case example with FAP-4-1BBL
Abstract
The majority of bispecific costimulatory antibodies in cancer immunotherapy are capable of exerting tumor-specific T-cell activation by simultaneously engaging both tumor-associated targets and costimulatory receptors expressed by T cells. The amount of trimeric complex formed when the bispecific antibody is bound simultaneously to the T cell receptor and the tumor-associated target follows a bell-shaped curve with increasing bispecific antibody exposure/dose. The shape of the curve is determined by the binding affinities of the bispecific antibody to its two targets and target expression. Here, using the case example of FAP-4-1BBL, a fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP)-directed 4-1BB (CD137) costimulator, the impact of FAP-binding affinity on trimeric complex formation and pharmacology was explored using mathematical modeling and simulation. We quantified (1) the minimum number of target receptors per cell required to achieve pharmacological effect, (2) the expected coverage of the patient population for 19 different solid tumor indications, and (3) the range of pharmacologically active exposures as a function of FAP-binding affinity. A 10-fold increase in FAP-binding affinity (from a dissociation constant [KD] of 0.7 nM–0.07 nM) was predicted to reduce the number of FAP receptors needed to achieve 90% of the maximum pharmacological effect from 13,400 to 4,000. Also, the number of patients with colon cancer that would achieve 90% of the maximum effect would increase from 6% to 39%. In this work, a workflow to select binding affinities for bispecific antibodies that integrates preclinical in vitro data, mathematical modeling and simulation, and knowledge on target expression in the patient population, is provided. The early implementation of this approach can increase the probability of success with cancer immunotherapy in clinical development.
Keywords
