Health Research Policy and Systems (Jul 2020)

Outcomes from Indo–United States–Egypt tri-national psychiatric research training programmes

  • Tulsi A. Malavia,
  • Vishwajit Nimgaonkar,
  • Triptish Bhatia,
  • Ibtihal M. A. Ibrahim,
  • Hader Mansour,
  • Maribeth Wesesky,
  • Joel Wood,
  • Smita N. Deshpande,
  • Mary Hawk

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00595-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The prevalence of mental health disorders is increasing globally. Countries in South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Middle East regions carry high burdens of mental health need; however, there are relatively few mental health research publications from this region, suggesting inadequate research funds and a paucity of qualified research personnel. To increase and strengthen the pool of mental health researchers in India and Egypt, we conducted three psychiatric research programmes in these countries: the Training Program for Psychiatric Genetics in India (2002–2011), the Tri-National Training Program for Psychiatric Genetics (2009–2014) and the Cross-Fertilized Research Training for New Investigators in Egypt and India (2014–2019). A total of 66 trainees, including psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, clinical psychologists and research psychologists, were supported in research development, which included didactic training, proposal development, hands-on research and manuscript preparation. Methods The aim of this study is to evaluate these three training programmes using the four-level Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation that assesses reaction, learning, behaviour and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was used to explore the data collected throughout the duration of the three training programmes. Online surveys were crafted and sent to the mentors and trainees of the three programmes to supplement objective training data. Results In addition to positive changes in the areas of reaction, learning and behaviour, significant outcomes were demonstrated. As of the writing of this manuscript, the trainees published a total of 130 papers, 59 as first author. In addition, 26 trainees have co-authored papers with one or more trainees or mentors, which demonstrates successful research networking and collaboration. Conclusion Our findings suggest that our training approach is a successful model for building independent mental health researchers. This is a critical step in the development of effective mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries.

Keywords