Indian Journal of Community Medicine (Jan 2023)

QTc interval of healthcare workers from India: Baseline and effect of hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Shreyas Gutte,
  • Mohan Gurjar,
  • Om Prakash Sanjeev,
  • Dharmendra Bhadauria,
  • Aditya Kapoor,
  • Prabhaker Mishra,
  • Afzal Azim,
  • Banani Poddar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_663_22
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 48, no. 3
pp. 497 – 500

Abstract

Read online

Background: The aim of this study was to access the incidence of prolonged QTc interval and changes, if any, among Indian healthcare workers (HCWs) taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) prophylaxis while managing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. Methods: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, as per the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) policy, HCWs were advised to take HCQ as prophylaxis after getting an electrocardiogram (ECG) while being posted to look after COVID-19 patients. A follow-up ECG was repeated for those who took HCQ. The normal upper limit for QTc interval of 460 milliseconds (ms) for females and 450 ms for males was considered. Results: A baseline ECG was analyzed for 250 HCWs with a median age of 35 (30–43) years. The median QTc was 410 (395–421) ms with the prevalence of prolonged QTc of 1.8% in females and 0% in males. A follow-up ECG after HCQ intake for 43 HCWs was further analyzed. They had a median age of 35 (31–39) years and took an average dose of HCQ of 2372 ± 839 mg. Pre- and post-HCQ chemoprophylaxis QTc interval (ms) was as follows: 408 (386–419) and 405 (387–417), with P = 0.434, respectively. Conclusion: Among Indian HCWs, the prevalence of prolonged QTc is 1.8% and 0% in females and males, respectively. HCQ intake as chemoprophylaxis for COVID-19 did not affect their QTc interval.

Keywords