Journal of Medical Case Reports (May 2021)

Hydrogel spacer shrinkage during external-beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy for high-risk prostate cancer: a case series

  • Katsumaro Kubo,
  • Masahiro Kenjo,
  • Hideo Kawabata,
  • Koichi Wadasaki,
  • Mitsuru Kajiwara,
  • Yoshiko Doi,
  • Minoru Nakao,
  • Hideharu Miura,
  • Shuichi Ozawa,
  • Yasushi Nagata

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02864-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Few studies have assessed hydrogel spacer shrinkage during external-beam radiation therapy following brachytherapy for localized high-risk prostate cancer. This case presentation evaluated the changes in hydrogel spacer appearance by magnetic resonance imaging during external-beam radiation therapy after brachytherapy for prostate cancer and analyzed the effect of this shrinkage on the dose distribution in four cases. Case presentation In all cases, we implanted 125I sources using a modified peripheral loading pattern for seed placement. The prescribed dose for each implant was 110 Gy. After delivering the sources, a hydrogel spacer was injected. All cases underwent external-beam radiation therapy approximately 1–2 months after brachytherapy. The prescribed dose of external-beam radiation therapy was 45 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed for evaluation on the day following seed implantation (baseline), at external-beam radiation therapy planning, and during external-beam radiation therapy. The median hydrogel spacer volume was 16.2 (range 10.9–17.7) cc at baseline, 14.4 (range, 9.4–16.1) cc at external-beam radiation therapy planning, and 7.1 (range, 2.0–11.4) cc during external-beam radiation therapy. The hydrogel spacer volume during external-beam radiation therapy was significantly lower than that at external-beam radiation therapy planning. The rectum V60–80 (rectal volume receiving at least 60–80% of the prescribed dose of external-beam radiation therapy) during external-beam radiation therapy was significantly higher than that at external-beam radiation therapy planning. Conclusions The potential reduction in hydrogel spacer size during external-beam radiation therapy following brachytherapy can lead to unexpected irradiation to the rectum. This case presentation would be helpful for similar cases.

Keywords