Journal of Asthma and Allergy (Jun 2021)

Effectiveness of Switching Biologics for Severe Asthma Patients in Japan: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

  • Numata T,
  • Araya J,
  • Miyagawa H,
  • Okuda K,
  • Fujita Y,
  • Utsumi H,
  • Takekoshi D,
  • Hashimoto M,
  • Minagawa S,
  • Ishikawa T,
  • Hara H,
  • Kuwano K

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 14
pp. 609 – 618

Abstract

Read online

Takanori Numata, Jun Araya, Hanae Miyagawa, Keitaro Okuda, Yu Fujita, Hirofumi Utsumi, Daisuke Takekoshi, Mitsuo Hashimoto, Shunsuke Minagawa, Takeo Ishikawa, Hiromichi Hara, Kazuyoshi Kuwano Division of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Takanori Numata Tel +81-3-3433-1111 (ex 3271)Fax +81-3-3433-1020Email [email protected]: In Japan, biologic therapy was initiated for patients with severe asthma in 2009. In recent years, four biologics with different mechanisms of action have become available in the clinical setting. However, the efficacy of switching between biologics remains uncertain.Methods: To elucidate the efficacy of switching between biologics, 97 patients were enrolled who had received any biologic therapy for severe asthma at Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, from July 2009 to December 2020. We retrospectively examined the patient characteristics, biomarkers, pulmonary function test results, selected biologics, and efficacy.Results: Thirty-one males and 66 females received any biologics. The mean age was 53.3 years at the initiation of biologic therapy. Initially, 33, 41, 15 and eight patients received omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab, respectively. Among three representative indicators for biologics administration, the peripheral blood eosinophil count, serum IgE levels and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, 64% of the patients had two indicators, and 28% had three indicators. Thirty-four patients (35%) switched from the initial biologic to another, and the reasons for switching included persistent asthmatic symptoms (n=22), schedule of hospital visits (n=5), and other reasons. Thus, the treatment was effective in 11 patients after switching. In addition, two patients received combination therapy with different biologics. Eighteen patients (19%) interrupted treatment for various reasons. Regardless of whether the biologic was the initial therapy, the overall efficacy of the four biologics was 60% based on the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness.Conclusion: Switching between biologics can be a promising option for severe asthma patients in whom treatment with an initial biologic is ineffective.Keywords: benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab, switching

Keywords