Machines (May 2023)

Geometric Design of a Low-Power Arcjet Constrictor and Determination of Velocity of Air-Based Plasma by Means of Analytical and Numerical Methods

  • Pedro José Argumedo Teuffer,
  • Luis Enrique Marron Ramirez,
  • Jean Fulbert Ituna-Yudonago,
  • Pablo Alejandro Arizpe Carreón,
  • Carlos Manuel Rodríguez Roman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11050527
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 5
p. 527

Abstract

Read online

The following research focuses on the analytical and numerical study of an arcjet constrictor. In order to perform these analyses, a geometric design of the constrictor was proposed. The analytical study considers mathematical models proposed by Stine and Watson, related to the properties of air propellants, such as the specific enthalpy, electric conductivity, thermal conductivity, and specific heat. The numerical study considered the equations for mass, momentum, energy, and electricity that describe the interaction between the electric arc and the fluid flow. These equations were solved in ANSYS FLUENT software, in which the κ-ϵ turbulence and the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models were used. The external routines, including user-defined functions, user-defined scalars, and user-defined memory were implemented in C++ language for source terms and linked to ANSYS FLUENT. The velocity profiles were obtained analytically for the electric arc temperatures of 9000 K, 10,000 K, and 11,000 K with peak magnitudes of 2960 m/s, 3350 m/s, and 3100 m/s, respectively, at the outlet of the constrictor. It was observed from the numerical results that the velocity magnitude of the air-based plasma inside the constrictor increases as the temperature of the electric arc rises up to 10,000 K However, above 10,000 K, the velocity magnitude decreases because at this temperature level, the air particles become completely ionized, and the specific heat of the air-based plasma decreases. The numerical simulation produced velocity profile magnitudes at two different electric arc temperatures (9000 K and 10,000 K) with peak magnitudes of 2400 m/s and 2900 m/s, respectively, at the outlet of the constrictor. The numerical and analytical results were very close with an error of 16.327%.

Keywords