Molecular Imaging (Jan 2021)

Comparison of 18F-FDG, 18F-Fluoroacetate, and 18F-FEPPA for Imaging Liver Fibrosis in a Bile Duct-Ligated Rat Model

  • Chun-Yi Wu,
  • Hsin-Hua Hsieh,
  • Pei-An Chu,
  • Wen-Hsiang Hong,
  • Ting-Yu Chang,
  • Chia-Fang Hsu,
  • Siao-Ting Lin,
  • Po-Hsun Su,
  • Shin-Lei Peng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7545284
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2021

Abstract

Read online

Developing sensitive diagnostic methods for a longitudinal evaluation of the status of liver fibrosis is a priority. This study is aimed at assessing the significance of longitudinal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18F-labeling tracers for assessing liver fibrosis in a rat model with bile duct ligation (BDL). Twenty-one 6-week-old Sprague-Dawley male rats were used in this study. Longitudinal PET images using [18F]N-2-(2-fluoroethoxy)benzyl)-N-(4-phenoxypyridin-3-yl)acetamide ([18F]FEPPA) (n=3), [18F]fluoroacetate ([18F]FAc) (n=3), and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) (n=3) were obtained at 0, 1, and 2 weeks after BDL. Biochemical assays, histological assays, immunohistochemical staining assays, and next generation sequencing analyses were also performed at 0 (n=3), 1 (n=3), 2 (n=3), and 3 (n=3) weeks after BDL, which demonstrated the severe damage in rat livers after BDL. Regarding [18F]FEPPA and [18F]FDG, there was a significantly higher uptake in the liver after BDL (both P<0.05), which lasted until week 2. However, the uptake of [18F]FAc in the liver was not significantly different before and after BDL (P=0.28). Collectively, both [18F]FEPPA and [18F]FDG can serve as sensitive probes for detecting the liver fibrosis. However, [18F]FAc is not recommended to diagnose liver fibrosis.