Frontiers in Oncology (Mar 2023)

Survival analyses of different treatment modalities and clinical stage for hypopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Tian-Yun Lin,
  • Tsung-Lun Lee,
  • Tsung-Lun Lee,
  • Yen-Bin Hsu,
  • Yen-Bin Hsu,
  • Shyh-Kuan Tai,
  • Shyh-Kuan Tai,
  • Ling-Wei Wang,
  • Ling-Wei Wang,
  • Muh-Hwa Yang,
  • Muh-Hwa Yang,
  • Muh-Hwa Yang,
  • Pen-Yuan Chu,
  • Pen-Yuan Chu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1109417
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveWe investigated the effects of different treatment modalities and clinical stage for hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC) patients.MethodsBetween February 2004 and December 2012, 167 HPC patients were reviewed. We calculated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local failure-free survival (LFFS), regional failure-free survival (RFFS), and distant metastasis failure-free survival (DMFFS) using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared various survival outcomes between definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery-based therapy (SBT).ResultsThere were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between SBT (n = 102) and definitive CRT (n = 65) groups. The 5-year rates of OS (59.7% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.0001) and PFS (49.9% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.0002) were significantly better in patients who received SBT than in those who received definitive CRT. The SBT group also obtained better LFFS (p < 0.0001), RFFS (p = 0.0479), and DMFFS (p = 0.0110). We did similar analyses by different T-classification (T1–2, T3, and T4) and found that SBT had better OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0020), PFS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0513), LFFS (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0075), RFFS (p = 0.1949 and p = 0.0826), and DMFFS (p = 0.0248 and p = 0.0436) in the T4 and T1–2 subgroups but similar OS (p = 0.9598), PFS (p = 0.5052), RFFS (p = 0.9648), and DMFFS (p = 0.8239) in T3 patients. Analyses by different overall stages revealed no differences between definitive CRT and SBT for stage III patients but significantly better results for stage IV patients who received SBT.ConclusionsSBT can obtain significant survival benefits when compared with definitive CRT for the whole cohort of patients. Definitive CRT has similar survival outcomes compared with SBT only for T3 tumors or overall stage III disease.

Keywords