Diameter limits impede restoration of historical conditions in dry mixed‐conifer forests of eastern Oregon, USA

Abstract

Abstract The U.S. Forest Service is reconsidering policies that limit the size of trees that can be removed in the course of restoration treatments in dry forests of eastern Oregon. To evaluate the effects of diameter limits on the ability of managers to meet restoration objectives, we used an existing network of long‐term research plots to summarize historical and contemporary structure and composition of mixed‐conifer forests within a one million‐ha study area in eastern Oregon. Then, we used a novel thinning simulation procedure to quantify the degree to which thinning using different diameter limits restored stands to historical conditions. Contemporary mixed‐conifer forests within the study area are significantly denser, have more basal area, and have a greater proportion of shade‐tolerant species than historical conditions. Our simulations of thinning under current policy that prohibits cutting of trees ≥53 cm show that a quarter of mixed‐conifer stands cannot be restored to within the historical range of basal area or density. Those stands that could be restored to within historical basal area ranges still had a substantially higher component of shade‐tolerant trees than historical stands. Permitting larger shade‐tolerant trees to be removed allowed restoration of all or most of stands to within historical structural and compositional ranges. Forest conditions in the late 1800s may not necessarily provide the best template for management because climate and disturbance projections suggest that eastern Oregon forests will be less well suited to shade‐tolerant species in the future. Adapting stands to future conditions will require robust monitoring of forest structural and compositional response to restoration treatments.

Keywords

• 21‐inch rule
• climate change adaptation
• co‐production of research
• diameter limits
• Douglas‐fir
• eastside screens