Journal of Integrative Neuroscience (Jan 2024)

Efficacy of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Treating General Psychopathology Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis

  • Wenqian Huang,
  • Hong Wang,
  • Na Hu,
  • Jiabao Chai,
  • Xuanzi Zhou,
  • Fuquan Liu,
  • Ying Li

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin2301007
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
p. 7

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been shown to effectively alleviate negative and positive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. However, its impact on depressive symptoms and general psychopathology symptoms (GPSs), which are crucial for functional outcomes, remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy of various NIBS interventions in treating depressive symptoms and GPSs. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of NIBS in treating depressive symptoms and GPSs in schizophrenia. The effect sizes of NIBS for depression symptoms and GPSs were estimated using standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were employed to examine potential influencing factors on the pooled SMD of NIBS for GPSs. Results: Our search yielded 35 randomized controlled trials involving 1715 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. The protocol of this systematic review was registered with INPLASY (protocol ID: INPLASY202320082). Neither repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) nor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) demonstrated significant improvements in depressive symptoms compared to sham controls. NIBS exhibited a small-to-moderate effect size for GPSs, with a pooled SMD of –0.2956 (95% CI: –0.459 to –0.132) and a heterogeneity (I2) of 58.9% (95% CI: 41.5% to 71.1%; p < 0.01) based on a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses of different types of NIBS, different frequencies of rTMS, and different stimulation sites of rTMS revealed no significant differences. Only sex had a significant influence on the effect size of NIBS for general psychopathology symptoms (p < 0.05). However, rTMS might be superior to tDCS, and high-frequency rTMS outperformed low-frequency rTMS in treating GPSs. Conclusions: We found a small-to-moderate effect size of NIBS in alleviating GPSs in patients with schizophrenia. Both rTMS and tDCS were more effective than sham stimulation in reducing GPSs in schizophrenia. The frequency used was associated with rTMS efficacy for GPSs.

Keywords