Frontiers in Psychology (Aug 2021)

How Adolescents and Adults Learn About Changes in the Trustworthiness of Others Through Dynamic Interaction

  • Siying Li,
  • Siying Li,
  • Siying Li,
  • Siying Li,
  • Xinmin Hao,
  • Xinmin Hao,
  • Xinmin Hao,
  • Xinmin Hao,
  • Yueqi Mei,
  • Yinyi Cheng,
  • Yinyi Cheng,
  • Yinyi Cheng,
  • Yinyi Cheng,
  • Nan Sun,
  • Chen Qu,
  • Chen Qu,
  • Chen Qu,
  • Chen Qu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690494
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Whether to trust or distrust another individual is a complex interpersonal challenge, especially when such individuals behave inconsistently. It is still unclear as to how individuals learn and adapt to fluctuations in the trustworthiness of others and how this process changes from adolescence to adulthood. To address these issues, we implemented repeated rounds of a trust game within the context of a complicated and changeable interpersonal environment. Specifically, adolescents and adults played the role of trustors who had to decide whether to invest money in two anonymous partners carrying the risk of no reciprocation. Unbeknownst to participants, these two partners had different trustworthiness profiles: one partner initially yielded a higher initial return rate (70%) while the other initially yielded a lower initial return rate (30%). Crucially, over repeated rounds, these two partners gradually changed their responses to the point where, finally, return rates were both neutral (50%). Results indicated that all participants showed less updating in the negative direction in response to good-to-neutral partners while more updating in the positive direction in response to the bad-to-neutral partner. Compared to adults, this behavioral disparity in responses to good-to-neutral and bad-to-neutral partners was less pronounced in adolescents. Based on the computational modeling approach, the potential mechanisms underlying their behavioral patterns were revealed: the higher learning rate promoted flexible adaptions in participants to untrustworthy trustees as they changed to neutral. The less pronounced distinction between good-to-neutral and bad-to-neutral partners in adolescents was related to their lower learning rate. Overall, our study extends the understanding of trust behavior to a fluctuating social context and highlights the role of social learning in social emotion and interaction.

Keywords