BMC Medical Research Methodology (Nov 2023)

Methods, strategies, and incentives to increase response to mental health surveys among adolescents: a systematic review

  • Julia Bidonde,
  • Jose F. Meneses-Echavez,
  • Elisabet Hafstad,
  • Geir Scott Brunborg,
  • Lasse Bang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02096-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 17

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background This systematic review aimed to identify effective methods to increase adolescents’ response to surveys about mental health and substance use, to improve the quality of survey information. Methods We followed a protocol and searched for studies that compared different survey delivery modes to adolescents. Eligible studies reported response rates, mental health score variation per survey mode and participant variations in mental health scores. We searched CENTRAL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Scopus in May 2022, and conducted citation searches in June 2022. Two reviewers independently undertook study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments. Following the assessment of heterogeneity, some studies were pooled using meta-analysis. Results Fifteen studies were identified, reporting six comparisons related to survey methods and strategies. Results indicate that response rates do not differ between survey modes (e.g., web versus paper-and-pencil) delivered in classroom settings. However, web surveys may yield higher response rates outside classroom settings. The largest effects on response rates were achieved using unconditional monetary incentives and obtaining passive parental consent. Survey mode influenced mental health scores in certain comparisons. Conclusions Despite the mixed quality of the studies, the low volume for some comparisons and the limit to studies in high income countries, several effective methods and strategies to improve adolescents’ response rates to mental health surveys were identified.

Keywords