Advances in Interventional Cardiology (Mar 2021)

Transcatheter transseptal mitral valve implantation with Edwards SAPIEN 3: the first experience of a single center

  • Paweł Kralisz,
  • Marek Frank,
  • Bożena Sobkowicz,
  • Slawomir Dobrzycki,
  • Tomasz Hirnle

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2021.104776
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 105 – 108

Abstract

Read online

In recent years, there has been a clear trend towards increased mitral bioprosthetic valve surgery in comparison to mechanical prostheses [1]. According to the ESC Guidelines mitral bioprostheses are recommended for patients > 70 years old or those with a life expectancy lower than the presumed durability of the bioprosthesis (class IIa/C). Importantly, the guidelines also recognize the prominence of quality of life after cardiosurgery and focus on patients’ preferences (class Ic), especially if long-term anticoagulation is nonoptimal (class Ic) [2]. Structural deterioration of mitral bioprostheses (structural valve deterioration – SVD) is the main limitation for their use. The average lifespan of a bioprosthetic valve is estimated at 16 years and the reoperation due to SVD affects as many as 75% of patients after a 20-year follow-up [3, 4]. Reoperation is usually associated with high risk of complications and mortality [5, 6].