Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience (Aug 2012)

Combining symbolic cues with sensory input and prior experience in an iterative Bayesian framework

  • Frederike Hermi Petzschner,
  • Frederike Hermi Petzschner,
  • Frederike Hermi Petzschner,
  • Frederike Hermi Petzschner,
  • Paul eMaier,
  • Paul eMaier,
  • Stefan eGlasauer,
  • Stefan eGlasauer,
  • Stefan eGlasauer,
  • Stefan eGlasauer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00058
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6

Abstract

Read online

Perception and action are the result of an integration of various sources of information, such as current sensory input, prior experience, or the context in which a stimulus occurs. Often, the interpretation is not trivial hence needs to be learned from the co-occurrence of stimuli. Yet, how do we combine such diverse information to guide our action?Here we use a distance production-reproduction task to investigate the influence of auxiliary, symbolic cues, sensory input, and prior experience on human performance under three different conditions that vary in the information provided. Our results indicate that subjects can (1) learn the mapping of a verbal, symbolic cue onto the stimulus dimension and (2) integrate symbolic information and prior experience into their estimate of displacements.The behavioral results are explained by to two distinct generative models that represent different structural approaches of how a Bayesian observer would combine prior experience, sensory input, and symbolic cue information into a single estimate of displacement. The first model interprets the symbolic cue in the context of categorization, assuming that it reflects information about a distinct underlying stimulus range (categorical model). The second model applies a multi-modal integration approach and treats the symbolic cue as additional sensory input to the system, which is combined with the current sensory measurement and the subjects’ prior experience (cue-combination model). Notably, both models account equally well for the observed behavior despite their different structural assumptions. The present work thus provides evidence that humans can interpret abstract symbolic information and combine it with other types of information such as sensory input and prior experience. The similar explanatory power of the two models further suggest that issues such as categorization and cue-combination could be explained by alternative probabilistic approaches.

Keywords