Journal of Intensive Care (Jul 2023)

The Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy for Critically Injured Patients (RESTRIC) trial: a cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial of restrictive transfusion in trauma

  • Mineji Hayakawa,
  • Takashi Tagami,
  • Daisuke Kudo,
  • Kota Ono,
  • Makoto Aoki,
  • Akira Endo,
  • Tetsuya Yumoto,
  • Yosuke Matsumura,
  • Shiho Irino,
  • Kazuhiko Sekine,
  • Noritaka Ushio,
  • Takayuki Ogura,
  • Sho Nachi,
  • Yuhei Irie,
  • Katsura Hayakawa,
  • Yusuke Ito,
  • Yuko Okishio,
  • Tomohiro Muronoi,
  • Yoshinori Kosaki,
  • Kaori Ito,
  • Keita Nakatsutsumi,
  • Yutaka Kondo,
  • Taichiro Ueda,
  • Hiroshi Fukuma,
  • Yuichi Saisaka,
  • Naoki Tominaga,
  • Takeo Kurita,
  • Fumihiko Nakayama,
  • Tomotaka Shibata,
  • Shigeki Kushimoto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00682-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The efficacies of fresh frozen plasma and coagulation factor transfusion have been widely evaluated in trauma-induced coagulopathy management during the acute post-injury phase. However, the efficacy of red blood cell transfusion has not been adequately investigated in patients with severe trauma, and the optimal hemoglobin target level during the acute post-injury and resuscitation phases remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy was clinically non-inferior to a liberal transfusion strategy during the acute post-injury phase. Methods This cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial was conducted at 22 tertiary emergency medical institutions in Japan and included adult patients with severe trauma at risk of major bleeding. The institutions were allocated a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy (target hemoglobin levels: 7–9 or 10–12 g/dL, respectively). The strategies were applied to patients immediately after arrival at the emergency department. The primary outcome was 28-day survival after arrival at the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, complication rates, and event-free days. The non-inferiority margin was set at 3%. Results The 28-day survival rates of patients in the restrictive (n = 216) and liberal (n = 195) strategy groups were 92.1% and 91.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 28-day survival in the restrictive versus liberal strategy group was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.49–2.13). Significant non-inferiority was not observed. Transfusion volumes and hemoglobin levels were lower in the restrictive strategy group than in the liberal strategy group. No between-group differences were noted in complication rates or event-free days. Conclusions Although non-inferiority of the restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for 28-day survival was not statistically significant, the mortality and complication rates were similar between the groups. The restrictive transfusion strategy results in a lower transfusion volume. Trial registration number: umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405, registration date: 8 October 2018.

Keywords