Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (Jan 2025)

Development of the Italian version of the Motricity Index and evaluation of its reliability in adults with stroke

  • Diego Longo,
  • Stefano Doronzio,
  • Michele Piazzini,
  • Angela Maria Politi,
  • Tommaso Ciapetti,
  • Filippo Gerli,
  • Monica Barnabé,
  • Francesca Ciullini,
  • Chiara Castagnoli,
  • Ilaria Pellegrini,
  • Marta Cannobio,
  • Donata Bardi,
  • Marco Baccini,
  • Francesca Cecchi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.40441
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 57

Abstract

Read online

Background: The Motricity Index (MI) is a commonly used method of measuring muscle strength in post-stroke hemiparesis. This study aimed to produce the MI Italian version (MI-IT) and assess its reliability in subjects with stroke. Methods: Phase-1: stepwise approach to MI-IT production and pilot-testing with 10 health professionals to ensure clarity of each item and instructions for administration and scoring. Phase-2: evaluation of MI-IT reliability on stroke subjects, each independently assessed by 2 raters randomly selected from a group of 10 physiotherapists; the first rater re-administered the MI-IT 1–3 days later. Intraclass correlation coefficients, Spearman’s rho and, limited to the more affected side, non-parametric limits of agreement (LOA) were computed for total MI-IT scores, squared weighted kappa and percentage of observed agreement for individual item scores. Results: The back-translated versions showed no discrepancies with original MI, but 3 items were revised after pilot-testing. Complete data on 50 (test–retest) and 51 (inter-rater) participants demonstrated excellent reliability of all MI-IT total scores on the more affected side (Spearman’s rho range: test–retest 0.953–0.975; inter-rater: 0.965–0.970), with LOA ranging from 9–25%), but poor inter-rater reliability for some scores on the less affected side (Spearman’s rho range: test–retest, 0.816–0.976; inter-rater: 0.508–0.721). Moderate to almost perfect agreement was found for all individual item scores, except for 2 items on the less affected side. Conclusions: The MI-IT is sufficiently reliable to evaluate motor impairment of the more affected side after stroke, with acceptable measurement error for all scores.

Keywords