Comparison of Lake Area Extraction Algorithms in Qinghai Tibet Plateau Leveraging Google Earth Engine and Landsat-9 Data

Abstract

Monitoring the lake waterbody area in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) is significant in dealing with global climate change. The latest released Landsat-9 data, which has higher radiation resolution and can be complemented with other Landsat data to improve imaging temporal resolution, have great potential for applications in lake area extraction. However, no study is published on identifying waterbodies and lakes in large-scale plateau scenes based on Landsat-9 data. Therefore, we relied on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform and selected ten waterbody extraction algorithms to evaluate the quantitative evaluation of waterbody and lake area extraction results on the QTP and explore the usability of Landsat-9 images in the relationship between the extraction accuracy and the algorithm. The results show that the random forest (RF) algorithm performs best in all models. The overall accuracy of waterbody extraction is 95.84%, and the average lake waterbody area extraction error is 1.505%. Among the traditional threshold segmentation waterbody extraction algorithms, the overall accuracy of the NDWI waterbody extraction method is 89.89%, and the average error of lake waterbody area extraction is 3.501%, which is the highest performance model in this kind of algorithm. The linear regression coefficients of NDVI and reflectance of Landsat-8 and Landsat-9 data are close to 1, and R2 is more significant than 0.91. At the same time, the overall accuracy difference of water extraction between the two data is not better than 1.1%. This study proves that Landsat-9 and Landsat-8 data have great consistency, which can be used for collaborative analysis to identify plateau waterbodies more efficiently. With the development of cloud computing technologies, such as Gee, more complex models, such as RF, can be selected to improve the extraction accuracy of the waterbody and lake area in large-scale research.

Keywords

• Landsat-9 data
• Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
• lake waterbody
• GEE
• algorithms comparison