Blood Advances (Oct 2017)

Baseline mutational patterns and sustained MRD negativity in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma

  • Sham Mailankody,
  • Dickran Kazandjian,
  • Neha Korde,
  • Mark Roschewski,
  • Elisabet Manasanch,
  • Manisha Bhutani,
  • Nishant Tageja,
  • Mary Kwok,
  • Yong Zhang,
  • Adriana Zingone,
  • Laurence Lamy,
  • Rene Costello,
  • Candis Morrison,
  • Malin Hultcrantz,
  • Austin Christofferson,
  • Megan Washington,
  • Martin Boateng,
  • Seth M. Steinberg,
  • Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson,
  • William D. Figg,
  • Elli Papaemmanuil,
  • Wyndham H. Wilson,
  • Jonathan J. Keats,
  • Ola Landgren

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1, no. 22
pp. 1911 – 1918

Abstract

Read online

Abstract: Early results of a prospective phase 2 clinical trial of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide maintenance in high-risk smoldering myeloma showed promising results that were previously published. Here, we provide novel insights into the genetic landscape of high-risk smoldering myeloma and information on sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity with an expanded cohort of patients. Eighteen patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma were enrolled between 29 May 2012, and 14 January 2014. We included patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled in a parallel trial who received the same therapy (reference group). The overall response rate was 100%. With median potential follow-up of 43.3 months, 10 (63%) remain in MRD negativity, and the estimated 4-year progression-free and overall survival rates are 71% and 100%, respectively. Importantly, we report differences in mutational patterns in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, reflected in a lower frequency of mutations in significant myeloma genes (6.6% vs 45%) and NFKB pathway genes (6.6% vs 25%). Treatment with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide maintenance was associated with a 100% response rate and 63% MRD negativity with a safety profile consistent with previous reports for this regimen. This study had a small numbers of participants, but there seemed to be important differences in the genetic landscape of patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma and those with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, suggestive of a more treatment-responsive biology in early disease.