Atoms (Oct 2018)

Iron X-ray Transmission at Temperature Near 150 eV Using the National Ignition Facility: First Measurements and Paths to Uncertainty Reduction

  • Robert Heeter,
  • Ted Perry,
  • Heather Johns,
  • Kathy Opachich,
  • Maryum Ahmed,
  • Jim Emig,
  • Joe Holder,
  • Carlos Iglesias,
  • Duane Liedahl,
  • Richard London,
  • Madison Martin,
  • Nathaniel Thompson,
  • Brian Wilson,
  • Tom Archuleta,
  • Tana Cardenas,
  • Evan Dodd,
  • Melissa Douglas,
  • Kirk Flippo,
  • Christopher Fontes,
  • John Kline,
  • Lynn Kot,
  • Natalia Krasheninnikova,
  • Manolo Sherrill,
  • Todd Urbatsch,
  • Eric Huffman,
  • James King,
  • Russell Knight,
  • James Bailey,
  • Gregory Rochau

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms6040057
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 4
p. 57

Abstract

Read online

Discrepancies exist between theoretical and experimental opacity data for iron, at temperatures 180⁻195 eV and electron densities near 3 × 1022/cm3, relevant to the solar radiative-convective boundary. Another discrepancy, between theory and helioseismic measurements of the boundary’s location, would be ameliorated if the experimental opacity is correct. To address these issues, this paper details the first results from new experiments under development at the National Ignition Facility (NIF), using a different method to replicate the prior experimental conditions. In the NIF experiments, 64 laser beams indirectly heat a plastic-tamped rectangular iron-magnesium sample inside a gold cavity. Another 64 beams implode a spherical plastic shell to produce a continuum X-ray flash which backlights the hot sample. An X-ray spectrometer records the transmitted X-rays, the unattenuated X-rays passing around the sample, and the sample’s self-emission. From these data, X-ray transmission spectra are inferred, showing Mg K-shell and Fe L-shell X-ray transitions from plasma at a temperature of ~150 eV and electron density of ~8 × 1021/cm3. These conditions are similar to prior Z measurements which agree better with theory. The NIF transmission data show statistical uncertainties of 2⁻10%, but various systematic uncertainties must be addressed before pursuing quantitative comparisons. The paths to reduction of the largest uncertainties are discussed. Once the uncertainty is reduced, future NIF experiments will probe higher temperatures (170⁻200 eV) to address the ongoing disagreement between theory and Z data.

Keywords