Erratum to: Generalizing the relativistic quantization condition to include all three-pion isospin channels

Abstract

We have found an error in a statement following eq. (2.5) of our paper, concerning the function f (a, b, k) that first appears in that equation. The issue arises in the statement that it is convenient to take the function f (a, b, k) to be exchange symmetric with respect to its three arguments. This has the unwanted consequence of making six of the seven operators in the column vector of eq. (2.4) identically equal. This, in turn, implies that many operators are identically zero in the definite isospin basis, considered in section 2.4. To repair this, the last sentence of the paragraph containing eq. (2.4), starting “It is convenient for the subsequent…”, should be removed, as should footnote 3 and the next paragraph, beginning with “At this point, the reader may wonder why…”.