Molecular Cancer (Mar 2024)

An international phase II trial and immune profiling of SBRT and atezolizumab in advanced pretreated colorectal cancer

  • Antonin Levy,
  • Daphné Morel,
  • Matthieu Texier,
  • Roger Sun,
  • Jerome Durand-Labrunie,
  • Maria E Rodriguez-Ruiz,
  • Severine Racadot,
  • Stéphane Supiot,
  • Nicolas Magné,
  • Stacy Cyrille,
  • Guillaume Louvel,
  • Christophe Massard,
  • Loic Verlingue,
  • Fanny Bouquet,
  • Alberto Bustillos,
  • Lisa Bouarroudj,
  • Clément Quevrin,
  • Céline Clémenson,
  • Michele Mondini,
  • Lydia Meziani,
  • Lambros Tselikas,
  • Rastilav Bahleda,
  • Antoine Hollebecque,
  • Eric Deutsch

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-024-01970-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Immuno-radiotherapy may improve outcomes for patients with advanced solid tumors, although optimized combination modalities remain unclear. Here, we report the colorectal (CRC) cohort analysis from the SABR-PDL1 trial that evaluated the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in advanced cancer patients. Methods Eligible patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks until progression or unmanageable toxicity, together with ablative SBRT delivered concurrently with the 2nd cycle (recommended dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions, adapted upon normal tissue tolerance constraint). SBRT was delivered to at least one tumor site, with at least one additional measurable lesion being kept from the radiation field. The primary efficacy endpoint was one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate from the start of atezolizumab. Sequential tumor biopsies were collected for deep multi-feature immune profiling. Results Sixty pretreated (median of 2 prior lines) advanced CRC patients (38 men [63%]; median age, 59 years [range, 20–81 years]; 77% with liver metastases) were enrolled in five centers (France: n = 4, Spain: n = 1) from 11/2016 to 04/2019. All but one (98%) received atezolizumab and 54/60 (90%) received SBRT. The most frequently irradiated site was lung (n = 30/54; 56.3%). Treatment-related G3 (no G4-5) toxicity was observed in 3 (5%) patients. Median OS and PFS were respectively 8.4 [95%CI:5.9–11.6] and 1.4 months [95%CI:1.2–2.6], including five (9%) patients with PFS > 1 year (median time to progression: 19.2 months, including 2/5 MMR-proficient). Best overall responses consisted of stable disease (n = 38; 64%), partial (n = 3; 5%) and complete response (n = 1; 2%). Immune-centric multiplex IHC and RNAseq showed that SBRT redirected immune cells towards tumor lesions, even in the case of radio-induced lymphopenia. Baseline tumor PD-L1 and IRF1 nuclear expression (both in CD3 + T cells and in CD68 + cells) were higher in responding patients. Upregulation of genes that encode for proteins known to increase T and B cell trafficking to tumors (CCL19, CXCL9), migration (MACF1) and tumor cell killing (GZMB) correlated with responses. Conclusions This study provides new data on the feasibility, efficacy, and immune context of tumors that may help identifying advanced CRC patients most likely to respond to immuno-radiotherapy. Trial registration EudraCT N°: 2015–005464-42; Clinicaltrial.gov number: NCT02992912.