Cancers (Feb 2022)

A Prospective Phase II Study of Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Report of Feasibility, Safety, and Patient-Reported Outcomes

  • Kaley E. Woods,
  • Ting Martin Ma,
  • Kiri A. Cook,
  • Eric D. Morris,
  • Yu Gao,
  • Ke Sheng,
  • Amar U. Kishan,
  • John V. Hegde,
  • Carol Felix,
  • Vincent Basehart,
  • Kelsey Narahara,
  • Zhouhuizi Shen,
  • Stephen Tenn,
  • Michael L. Steinberg,
  • Robert K. Chin,
  • Minsong Cao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040939
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 4
p. 939

Abstract

Read online

This study reports the initial results for the first 15 patients on a prospective phase II clinical trial exploring the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the HyperArc technique for recurrent head and neck cancer treatment. Eligible patients were simulated and planned with both conventional VMAT and HyperArc techniques and the plan with superior dosimetry was selected for treatment. Dosimetry, delivery feasibility and safety, treatment-related toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) were all evaluated. HyperArc was chosen over conventional VMAT for all 15 patients and enabled statistically significant increases in dose conformity (R50% reduced by 1.2 ± 2.1, p p p p < 0.01), and the mean intrafraction motion was ≤ 0.5 ± 0.4 mm and ≤0.3 ± 0.1°. With a median follow-up of 12 months, treatment-related toxicity was minimal (only one grade 3 acute toxicity above baseline) and patient-reported QOL metrics were favorable. HyperArc enabled superior dosimetry and significant target dose escalation compared to conventional VMAT planning, and treatment delivery was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated by patients.

Keywords