Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
J. Cosmidis
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
M. S. Fantle
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
C. M. Lowery
Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA
B. H. Passey
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
S. P. S. Gulick
Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA
J. V. Morgan
Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London London UK
V. Vajda
Department of Palaeobiology Swedish Museum of Natural History Stockholm Sweden
M. T. Whalen
Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks AK USA
A. Wittmann
Eyring Materials Center Arizona State University Tempe AZ USA
N. Artemieva
Planetary Science Institute Tucson AZ USA
K. Farley
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
S. Goderis
Department of Chemistry Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium
E. Hajek
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
P. J. Heaney
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
D. A. Kring
Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston TX USA
S. L. Lyons
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
C. Rasmussen
Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA
E. Sibert
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Yale University New Haven CT USA
F. J. Rodríguez Tovar
Departamento de Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Granada Granada Spain
G. Turner‐Walker
Graduate School of Cultural Heritage Conservation National Yunlin University of Science and Technology Yunlin Taiwan
J. C. Zachos
Earth and Planetary Sciences University of California Santa Cruz CA USA
J. Carte
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
S. A. Chen
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
C. Cockell
School of Physics and Astronomy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
M. Coolen
Organic and Isotope Geochemistry Centre, The Institute for Geoscience Research, School of Earth and Planetary Science Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia
K. H. Freeman
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
J. Garber
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
M. Gonzalez
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
J. L. Gray
Materials Research Institute Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
K. Grice
Organic and Isotope Geochemistry Centre, The Institute for Geoscience Research, School of Earth and Planetary Science Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia
H. L. Jones
Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA
B. Schaefer
Organic and Isotope Geochemistry Centre, The Institute for Geoscience Research, School of Earth and Planetary Science Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia
J. Smit
Department of Geology and Geochemistry VU Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
S. M. Tikoo
Department of Geophysics Stanford University Stanford CA USA
Abstract An expanded sedimentary section provides an opportunity to elucidate conditions in the nascent Chicxulub crater during the hours to millennia after the Cretaceous‐Paleogene (K‐Pg) boundary impact. The sediments were deposited by tsunami followed by seiche waves as energy in the crater declined, culminating in a thin hemipelagic marlstone unit that contains atmospheric fallout. Seiche deposits are predominantly composed of calcite formed by decarbonation of the target limestone during impact followed by carbonation in the water column. Temperatures recorded by clumped isotopes of these carbonates are in excess of 70°C, with heat likely derived from the central impact melt pool. Yet, despite the turbidity and heat, waters within the nascent crater basin soon became a viable habitat for a remarkably diverse cross section of the food chain. The earliest seiche layers deposited with days or weeks of the impact contain earliest Danian nannoplankton and dinocyst survivors. The hemipelagic marlstone representing the subsequent years to a few millennia contains a nearly monogeneric calcareous dinoflagellate resting cyst assemblage suggesting deteriorating environmental conditions, with one interpretation involving low light levels in the impact aftermath. At the same horizon, microbial fossils indicate a thriving bacterial community and unique phosphatic fossils including appendages of pelagic crustaceans, coprolites and bacteria‐tunneled fish bone, suggesting that this rapid recovery of the base of the food chain may have supported the survival of larger, higher trophic‐level organisms. The extraordinarily diverse fossil assemblage indicates that the crater was a unique habitat in the immediate impact aftermath, possibly as a result of heat and nutrients supplied by hydrothermal activity.