Cancers (May 2024)

Daratumumab during Myeloma Induction Therapy Is Associated with Impaired Stem Cell Mobilization and Prolonged Post-Transplant Hematologic Recovery

  • Julian Mehl,
  • Dilara Akhoundova,
  • Ulrike Bacher,
  • Barbara Jeker,
  • Gaëlle Rhyner Agocs,
  • Axel Ruefer,
  • Susanne Soltermann,
  • Martin Soekler,
  • Annette Winkler,
  • Michael Daskalakis,
  • Thomas Pabst

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101854
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 10
p. 1854

Abstract

Read online

Daratumumab is being increasingly integrated into first-line multiple myeloma (MM) induction regimens, leading to improved response depth and longer progression-free survival. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is commonly performed as a consolidation strategy following first-line induction in fit MM patients. We investigated a cohort of 155 MM patients who received ASCT after first-line induction with or without daratumumab (RVd, n = 110; D-RVd, n = 45), analyzing differences in stem cell mobilization, apheresis, and engraftment. In the D-RVd group, fewer patients successfully completed mobilization at the planned apheresis date (44% vs. 71%, p = 0.0029), and more patients required the use of rescue plerixafor (38% vs. 28%, p = 0.3052). The median count of peripheral CD34+ cells at apheresis was lower (41.37 vs. 52.19 × 106/L, p = 0.0233), and the total number of collected CD34+ cells was inferior (8.27 vs. 10.22 × 106/kg BW, p = 0.0139). The time to recovery of neutrophils and platelets was prolonged (12 vs. 11 days, p = 0.0164; and 16 vs. 14 days, p = 0.0002, respectively), and a higher frequency of erythrocyte transfusions (74% vs. 51%, p = 0.0103) and a higher number of platelet concentrates/patients were required (4 vs. 2; p = 0.001). The use of daratumumab during MM induction might negatively impact stem cell mobilization and engraftment in the context of ASCT.

Keywords