Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (May 2024)

Dynamic changes of hepatic vein Doppler velocities predict preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

  • Mario Bruna,
  • Sebastian Alfaro,
  • Felipe Muñoz,
  • Liliana Cisternas,
  • Cecilia Gonzalez,
  • Rodrigo Conlledo,
  • Rodrigo Ulloa-Morrison,
  • Marcos Huilcaman,
  • Jaime Retamal,
  • Ricardo Castro,
  • Philippe Rola,
  • Adrian Wong,
  • Eduardo R. Argaiz,
  • Roberto Contreras,
  • Glenn Hernandez,
  • Eduardo Kattan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00631-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Assessment of dynamic parameters to guide fluid administration is one of the mainstays of current resuscitation strategies. Each test has its own limitations, but passive leg raising (PLR) has emerged as one of the most versatile preload responsiveness tests. However, it requires real-time cardiac output (CO) measurement either through advanced monitoring devices, which are not routinely available, or echocardiography, which is not always feasible. Analysis of the hepatic vein Doppler waveform change, a simpler ultrasound-based assessment, during a dynamic test such as PLR could be useful in predicting preload responsiveness. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic vein Doppler S and D-wave velocities during PLR as a predictor of preload responsiveness. Methods Prospective observational study conducted in two medical–surgical ICUs in Chile. Patients in circulatory failure and connected to controlled mechanical ventilation were included from August to December 2023. A baseline ultrasound assessment of cardiac function was performed. Then, simultaneously, ultrasound measurements of hepatic vein Doppler S and D waves and cardiac output by continuous pulse contour analysis device were performed during a PLR maneuver. Results Thirty-seven patients were analyzed. 63% of the patients were preload responsive defined by a 10% increase in CO after passive leg raising. A 20% increase in the maximum S wave velocity after PLR showed the best diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 69.6% (49.1–84.4) and specificity of 92.8 (68.5–99.6) to detect preload responsiveness, with an area under curve of receiving operator characteristic (AUC–ROC) of 0.82 ± 0.07 (p = 0.001 vs. AUC–ROC of 0.5). D-wave velocities showed worse diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions Hepatic vein Doppler assessment emerges as a novel complementary technique with adequate predictive capacity to identify preload responsiveness in patients in mechanical ventilation and circulatory failure. This technique could become valuable in scenarios of basic hemodynamic monitoring and when echocardiography is not feasible. Future studies should confirm these results.

Keywords