Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics (Nov 2024)
Noninferiority of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Compared to Standard Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis in Pediatric Patients at Hackensack Meridian Health Children’s Hospital Emergency Department
Abstract
Sejal M Bhavsar,1 Nisha Polavarapu,2 Emery Haley,3 Natalie Luke,3 Mohit Mathur,4 Xiaofei Chen,5 Jim Havrilla,5 David Baunoch,6 Kenneth Lieberman7 1Department of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA; 2Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA; 3Department of Clinical Research, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA; 4Department of Medical Affairs, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA; 5Department of Bioinformatics, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA; 6Department of Research and Development, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA; 7Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USACorrespondence: David Baunoch, Pathnostics, 15545 Sand Canyon Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92618, USA, Tel +1-714-966-1221, Fax +1-714-966-1231, Email [email protected]: To establish the noninferiority of the rapid and sensitive multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) method versus standard urine culture (SUC) in pediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnostic testing.Methods: A United States of America (USA)-based single-center prospective observational study of 44 female and four male patients aged 3– 21 years old presenting to a Pediatric Emergency Department in New Jersey with clinically suspected UTI. Urine specimens were primarily collected via midstream voiding. Patients with antibiotic exposure within the week prior to presentation were excluded. Patient demographic data, clinical manifestations, and urinalysis results were recorded. Noninferiority testing comparing M-PCR and SUC was conducted using a method for paired binary data, with a noninferiority margin set at 5%. Noninferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the difference in detection rates between M-PCR and SUC lies entirely to the right of the value minus the noninferiority margin. All statistical calculations were performed using Python 3.10.12.Results: The two methods were concordant in two-thirds of cases. Of the 14 M-PCR-positive/SUC-negative discordant specimens, 13 (93%) contained a fastidious and/or emerging uropathogen (A. urinae, A. schaalii, G. vaginalis, C. riegelii, U. urealyticum, Viridans group Streptococci (VGS), and/or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS)). Neither symptom presentation nor urinalysis results differed significantly between participants with concordant positive results for UTI diagnosis and those with concordant negative results (non-UTI group).Conclusion: In this pediatric population, similar to previous findings in an older adult population, M-PCR established not only noninferiority but also superiority over SUC in detecting microorganisms in the urine.Keywords: symptoms, urinalysis, UTI, SUC, M-PCR, Guidance UTI
