Cancers (Aug 2021)

Clinical Categorization Algorithm (CLICAL) and Machine Learning Approach (SRF-CLICAL) to Predict Clinical Benefit to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients: Real-World Evidence from the Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy

  • Gabriele Madonna,
  • Giuseppe V. Masucci,
  • Mariaelena Capone,
  • Domenico Mallardo,
  • Antonio Maria Grimaldi,
  • Ester Simeone,
  • Vito Vanella,
  • Lucia Festino,
  • Marco Palla,
  • Luigi Scarpato,
  • Marilena Tuffanelli,
  • Grazia D'angelo,
  • Lisa Villabona,
  • Isabelle Krakowski,
  • Hanna Eriksson,
  • Felipe Simao,
  • Rolf Lewensohn,
  • Paolo Antonio Ascierto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164164
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 16
p. 4164

Abstract

Read online

The real-life application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may yield different outcomes compared to the benefit presented in clinical trials. For this reason, there is a need to define the group of patients that may benefit from treatment. We retrospectively investigated 578 metastatic melanoma patients treated with ICIs at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione “G. Pascale” of Napoli, Italy (INT-NA). To compare patients’ clinical variables (i.e., age, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), eosinophil, BRAF status, previous treatment) and their predictive and prognostic power in a comprehensive, non-hierarchical manner, a clinical categorization algorithm (CLICAL) was defined and validated by the application of a machine learning algorithm—survival random forest (SRF-CLICAL). The comprehensive analysis of the clinical parameters by log risk-based algorithms resulted in predictive signatures that could identify groups of patients with great benefit or not, regardless of the ICI received. From a real-life retrospective analysis of metastatic melanoma patients, we generated and validated an algorithm based on machine learning that could assist with the clinical decision of whether or not to apply ICI therapy by defining five signatures of predictability with 95% accuracy.

Keywords