PLoS ONE (Jan 2016)

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist Therapy.

  • Antje Gottschalk,
  • Henryk A Welp,
  • Laura Leser,
  • Christian Lanckohr,
  • Carola Wempe,
  • Björn Ellger

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148778
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 3
p. e0148778

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND:Dysregulations of blood glucose (BG) are associated with adverse outcome in critical illness; controlling BG to target appears to improve outcome. Since BG-control is challenging in daily intensive care practice BG-control remains poor especially in patients with rapidly fluctuating BG. To improve BG-control and to avoid deleterious hypoglycemia, automated online-measurement tools are advocated. We thus evaluated the point-accuracy of the subcutaneous Sentrino® Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGM, Medtronic Diabetes, Northridge, California) in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiac life support (ECLS) for cardiogenic shock. METHODS:Management of BG was performed according to institute's standard aiming at BG-levels between 100-145 mg/dl. CGM-values were recorded without taking measures into therapeutic account. Point-accuracy in comparison to intermittent BG-measurement by the ABL-blood-gas analyzer was determined. RESULTS:CGM (n = 25 patients) correlated significantly with ABL-values (r = 0.733, p<0.001). Mean error from standard was 15.0 mg/dl (11.9%). 44.2% of the readings were outside a 15% range around ABL-values. In one of 635 paired data-points, ABL revealed hypoglycemia (BG 32 mg/dl) whereas CGM did not show hypoglycemic values (132mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS:CGM reveals minimally invasive BG-values in critically ill adults with dynamically impaired tissue perfusion. Because of potential deviations from standard, CGM-readings must be interpreted with caution in specific ICU-populations.