Scientific Reports (Sep 2024)

Clinical strategy study on prenatal screening and diagnostic model for Down syndrome

  • Wei Luo,
  • Sha Liu,
  • Bin He,
  • Daiwen Han,
  • Lixing Yuan,
  • Kai Zhao,
  • Jun Tang,
  • Ling Pang,
  • Fene Zou,
  • Jianlong Liu,
  • Hongqian Liu,
  • Ting Bai,
  • Xiaosha Jing,
  • Tianyu Xia,
  • Cechuan Deng,
  • Yunyun Liu,
  • Jing Cheng,
  • Xiang Wei,
  • Lingling Xing,
  • Yuan Luo,
  • Quanfang Zhou,
  • Qian Zhu,
  • Shanling Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73183-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Exploring efficient and easily implementable prenatal screening strategies aims at birth defect prevention and control. However, there have been limited economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) strategies in China. Furthermore, these studies were predominantly confined to local or geographically proximate provinces and lacked universality and representativeness. This study assesses the health economics of current prenatal screening strategies and NIPS as first-line screening programs, analyzing their efficacy to determine an optimal strategy. From the perspective of health economics, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, and single-factor sensitivity were conducted for five different screening strategies using a decision tree model. Among pregnant women aged < 35 years who underwent only one screening for foetal Down syndrome (DS), the detection rate, false positive rate and positive predictive value of NIPS for foetuses with DS were superior to those of the other four serological screening methods. Although applying NIPS as first-line screening method yields the highest efficacy and benefits, it currently lacks cost-effectiveness when compared to serological screening and sequential NIPS screening strategies.

Keywords