Cancer Medicine (Jul 2024)

Phase 1 dose escalation study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan as monotherapy and in combination with azacitidine in patients with myeloid malignancies

  • Courtney D. DiNardo,
  • Rebecca Olin,
  • Eunice S. Wang,
  • Barry Skikne,
  • Joseph Rosenthal,
  • Prasanna Kumar,
  • Hiroyuki Sumi,
  • Yoshiyuki Hizukuri,
  • Ying Hong,
  • Parul Patel,
  • Takahiko Seki,
  • Tao Duan,
  • Arnaud Lesegretain,
  • Michael Andreeff

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70028
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 14
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Mouse double minute‐2 homolog (MDM2) plays a key role in downregulating p53 activity in hematologic malignancies, and its overexpression is associated with poor outcomes. Methods This phase 1 study assessed the safety and efficacy of different dosing regimens of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan as monotherapy and in combination with azacitidine (AZA) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Results Seventy‐four patients (monotherapy, n = 57; milademetan‐AZA combination, n = 17) were treated. The maximum tolerated dose of milademetan was 160 mg once daily given for the first 14–21 days of 28‐day cycles as monotherapy and on Days 5–14 in combination with AZA. Dose‐limiting toxicities were gastrointestinal, fatigue, or renal/electrolyte abnormalities. Treatment‐emergent adverse events related to milademetan occurred in 82.5% and 64.7% of participants in the monotherapy and AZA combination arms, respectively. Two participants (4.2%) in the monotherapy arm achieved complete remission (CR), and 1 (2.1%) achieved CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). Two participants (13.3%) achieved CRi in the combination arm. New TP53 mutations, detected only during milademetan monotherapy, were found pre‐existing below standard detection frequency by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Interpretation Milademetan was relatively well tolerated in this population; however, despite signals of activity, clinical efficacy was minimal.

Keywords