Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Feb 2022)

Comment on “Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: a case Study” by Huang et al. (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett.​​​​​​​

  • K. Ranjbar,
  • K. Ranjbar,
  • N. T. O'Neill,
  • Y. Aboel-Fetouh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1757-2022
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22
pp. 1757 – 1760

Abstract

Read online

The suggestion of Huang et al. (2015) on the climatological-scale transport of Asian dust to the Arctic appears to be an important and worthwhile assertion. It is unfortunate that the authors undermined, to a certain degree, the quality of that assertion by a misinterpretation of the critical 24 March 2010​​​​​​​ Arctic event (which was chosen by the authors to illustrate their generalized, climatological-scale Arctic transport claim). They attempted to characterize that key event using AERONET/AEROCAN retrievals taken a day later and misinterpreted those largely cloud-dominated retrievals as being representative of Asian dust while apparently not recognizing that the coarse-mode aerosol optical depth retrievals on the previous day were actually coherent with their Arctic transport hypothesis.