JTCVS Open (Dec 2023)

Safety and efficacy of delaying lung transplant surgery to a morning startCentral MessagePerspective

  • Samuel T. Kim, BA,
  • Yu Xia, MD, MS,
  • Peter D. Cho, BS,
  • Jonathan K. Ho, MD,
  • Swati Patel, MD,
  • Christine Lee, RN,
  • Abbas Ardehali, MD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16
pp. 1008 – 1017

Abstract

Read online

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of delaying lung transplantation until morning for donors with cross-clamp times occurring after 1:30 am. Methods: All consented adult lung transplant recipients between March 2018 and May 2022 with donor cross-clamp times between 1:30 am and 5 am were enrolled prospectively in this study. Skin incision for enrolled recipients was delayed until 6:30 am (Night group). The control group was identified using a 1:2 logistic propensity score method and included recipients of donors with cross-clamp times occurring at any other time of day (Day group). Short- and medium-term outcomes were examined between groups. The primary endpoint was early mortality (30-day and in-hospital). Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled in the Night group, along with 68 well-matched patients in the Day group. As expected, donors in the Night group had longer cold ischemia times compared to the Day group (344 minutes vs 285 minutes; P < .01). Thirty-day mortality (3% vs 3%; P = .99), grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (8% vs 4%; P = .40), postoperative complications (26% vs 38%; P = .28), and hospital length of stay (15 days vs 14 days; P = .91) were similar in the 2 groups. No significant differences were noted between groups in 3-year survival (70% vs 77%; P = .30) or freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (91% vs 95%; P = .75) at 3 years post-transplantation. The median follow-up was 752.5 days (interquartile range, 487-1048 days). Conclusions: Lung transplant recipients with donor cross-clamp times scheduled after 1:30 am may safely have their operations delayed until 6:30 am with acceptable outcomes. Adoption of such a policy in clinically appropriate settings may lead to an alternative workflow and improved team well-being.

Keywords