The Astronomical Journal (Jan 2023)

The Giant Accreting Protoplanet Survey (GAPlanetS)—Results from a 6 yr Campaign to Image Accreting Protoplanets

  • Katherine B. Follette,
  • Laird M. Close,
  • Jared R. Males,
  • Kimberly Ward-Duong,
  • William O. Balmer,
  • Jéa Adams Redai,
  • Julio Morales,
  • Catherine Sarosi,
  • Beck Dacus,
  • Robert J. De Rosa,
  • Fernando Garcia Toro,
  • Clare Leonard,
  • Bruce Macintosh,
  • Katie M. Morzinski,
  • Wyatt Mullen,
  • Joseph Palmo,
  • Raymond Nzaba Saitoti,
  • Elijah Spiro,
  • Helena Treiber,
  • Kevin Wagner,
  • Jason Wang,
  • David Wang,
  • Alex Watson,
  • Alycia J. Weinberger

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acc183
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 165, no. 6
p. 225

Abstract

Read online

Accreting protoplanets are windows into planet formation processes, and high-contrast differential imaging is an effective way to identify them. We report results from the Giant Accreting Protoplanet Survey (GAPlanetS), which collected H α differential imagery of 14 transitional disk host stars with the Magellan Adaptive Optics System. To address the twin challenges of morphological complexity and point-spread function instability, GAPlanetS required novel approaches for frame selection and optimization of the Karhounen–Loéve Image Processing algorithm pyKLIP . We detect one new candidate, CS Cha “c,” at a separation of 68 mas and a modest Δmag of 2.3. We recover the HD 142527 B and HD 100453 B accreting stellar companions in several epochs, and the protoplanet PDS 70 c in 2017 imagery, extending its astrometric record by nine months. Though we cannot rule out scattered light structure, we also recover LkCa 15 “b,” at H α ; its presence inside the disk cavity, absence in Continuum imagery, and consistency with a forward-modeled point source suggest that it remains a viable protoplanet candidate. Through targeted optimization, we tentatively recover PDS 70 c at two additional epochs and PDS 70 b in one epoch. Despite numerous previously reported companion candidates around GAplanetS targets, we recover no additional point sources. Our moderate H α contrasts do not preclude most protoplanets, and we report limiting H α contrasts at unrecovered candidate locations. We find an overall detection rate of ∼36 ${}_{-22}^{+26} \% $ , considerably higher than most direct imaging surveys, speaking to both GAPlanetS’s highly targeted nature and the promise of H α differential imaging for protoplanet identification.

Keywords