Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Nov 2024)

External validation of the Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prediction models (L-TRRiP) for the prediction of recurrence after a first venous thrombosis in the Heart and Vascular Health study

  • J. Louise I. Burggraaf-van Delft,
  • Kerri L. Wiggins,
  • Nienke van Rein,
  • Saskia le Cessie,
  • Nicholas L. Smith,
  • Suzanne C. Cannegieter

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 8
p. 102610

Abstract

Read online

Background: Long-term outcome after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) might be optimized by tailoring anticoagulant treatment duration on individual risks of recurrence and major bleeding. The L-TRRiP models (A–D) were previously developed in data from the Dutch Multiple Environment and Genetic Assessment of Risk Factors for Venous thrombosis study to predict VTE recurrence. Objectives: We aimed to externally validate models C and D using data from the United States Heart and Vascular Health (HVH) study. Methods: Data from participants with a first VTE who discontinued initial anticoagulant therapy were used to determine model performance. Missing data were imputed, and results were pooled according to Rubin’s rules. To determine discrimination, Harrell’s C-statistic was calculated. To assess calibration, the observed/expected (O/E) ratio was estimated, and calibration plots were created, in which we accounted for the competing risk of death. A stratified analysis based on age 70 years was performed. Results: Of 1430 participants from the HVH study, 187 experienced an unprovoked VTE recurrence during follow-up. The C-statistics of L-TRRIP models C and D were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56-0.67) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.55-0.67), respectively. The O/E ratio (1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.17 and 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.27, respectively) and calibration plots indicated good calibration. The discrimination was similar between participants 70 years, whereas overall calibration was lower in participants <70 years. Conclusion: The L-TRRiP models showed moderate discrimination and good calibration in a different population and can be used to guide clinical decision making. To assess the added value in daily clinical practice, a management study is needed.

Keywords