Synthesis of an Ionic Liquid-Based Cutting Lubricant and Its Performance Comparison with Mineral Oil in Hard Turning

Abstract

This study compares the hard turning performance under dual-nozzle minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) using mineral oil and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride-based ionic fluids. Key performance indicators, including tool life (based on tool wear), surface roughness, cutting power, cutting temperature, cutting sound, carbon emission, and circularity error, were evaluated to assess manufacturing sustainability. The results revealed that ionic fluid-assisted MQL significantly outperformed mineral oil, improving tool life by 28.75% and reducing surface roughness by 5.58%, attributed to the superior lubrication and cooling ability of ionic fluids. Additionally, after 85 min of machining, the power consumption and carbon emission were greatly reduced under ionic fluid conditions, indicating a lower environmental impact. For precision machining concerns, the ionic fluid proved more favorable, as circularity error under mineral oil conditions was 2.67 times higher than with ionic fluids. The weighted Pugh matrix awarded ionic fluid a higher sustainability score (+7) than mineral oil (+1), establishing it as the superior cooling option for hard turning, enhancing sustainability in machining difficult-to-cut metals.

Keywords

• hard turning
• mineral oil
• ionic liquid
• dual-nozzle MQL
• flank wear
• surface roughness