Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (Oct 2018)

Perspective on Improving Environmental Monitoring of Biothreats

  • John Dunbar,
  • Segaran Pillai,
  • David Wunschel,
  • Michael Dickens,
  • Stephen A. Morse,
  • Stephen A. Morse,
  • David Franz,
  • Andrew Bartko,
  • Jean Challacombe,
  • Timothy Persons,
  • Molly A. Hughes,
  • Steve R. Blanke,
  • Robin Holland,
  • Janine Hutchison,
  • Eric D. Merkley,
  • Katrina Campbell,
  • Catherine S. Branda,
  • Shashi Sharma,
  • Luther Lindler,
  • Kevin Anderson,
  • David Hodge

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00147
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6

Abstract

Read online

For more than a decade, the United States has performed environmental monitoring by collecting and analyzing air samples for a handful of biological threat agents (BTAs) in order to detect a possible biological attack. This effort has faced numerous technical challenges including timeliness, sampling efficiency, sensitivity, specificity, and robustness. The cost of city-wide environmental monitoring using conventional technology has also been a challenge. A large group of scientists with expertise in bioterrorism defense met to assess the objectives and current efficacy of environmental monitoring and to identify operational and technological changes that could enhance its efficacy and cost-effectiveness, thus enhancing its value. The highest priority operational change that was identified was to abandon the current concept of city-wide environmental monitoring because the operational costs were too high and its value was compromised by low detection sensitivity and other environmental factors. Instead, it was suggested that the focus should primarily be on indoor monitoring and secondarily on special-event monitoring because objectives are tractable and these operational settings are aligned with likelihood and risk assessments. The highest priority technological change identified was the development of a reagent-less, real-time sensor that can identify a potential airborne release and trigger secondary tests of greater sensitivity and specificity for occasional samples of interest. This technological change could be transformative with the potential to greatly reduce operational costs and thereby create the opportunity to expand the scope and effectiveness of environmental monitoring.

Keywords