i-Perception (Feb 2021)

Walking on Visual Illusions

  • Greig Dickson,
  • Daria Burtan,
  • Shelley James,
  • David Phillips,
  • Jasmina Stevanov,
  • Priscilla Heard,
  • Ute Leonards

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520981101
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

In nature, sensory and physical characteristics of the environment tend to match; for example, a surface that looks bumpy is bumpy. In human-built environments, they often don’t. Here, we report observations from people exploring if mismatch between visual and physical characteristics affected their perceived walking experience. Participants walked across four flat floors, each comprising of a visual illusion: two patterns perceived as alternating 3D “furrows and ridges,” the Primrose Field illusion, and a variant of the Cafe Wall illusion as a control pattern without perceived 3D effects. Participants found all patterns intriguing to look at; some describing them as “playful” or “gentle.” More than half found some of the patterns uncomfortable to walk on, aversive, affecting walking stability, and occasionally even evoking fear of falling. These experiences raise crucial research questions for the vision sciences into the impact of architectural design on well-being and walkability.