Newborn screening for inborn errors of immunity: The status worldwide

Abstract

Background: Newborn screening (NBS) for the early detection of inborn errors of immunity (IEI) has been implemented in a few countries. The objective of this study was to verify the situation and define obstacles to the implementation of NBS worldwide. Methods: A questionnaire was developed by the Inborn Errors of Immunity Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) with 17 questions regarding NBS for IEI in the physician's workplace, NBS test type, problems hindering NBS implementation, reimbursement for IEI therapy, presence of a national IEI registry, referral centers, molecular diagnosis, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers, gene therapy, and immunoglobulin replacement therapy. The survey was sent by email once a week to doctors and others associated with WAO and the main immunology societies worldwide as a Google Form™ to be completed during September and October 2021. Results: Two hundred twenty-nine questionnaires were completed, of which 216 (94.3%) were completed by physicians. One hundred seventy-six (76.8%) physicians were both allergists and immunologists. The agreement between allergists/immunologists and non-allergists/non-immunologists for the question “Is there NBS for IEI in the country you work in?” was good (κ = 0,64: 95% CI 0.55–0.69). Ninety-eight (42.8%) participants were from Latin America, 35 (15.3%) from North America, 29 (12.6%) from Europe, 18 (7.9%) from Africa, 44 (19.2%) from Asia, and 5 (2.2%) from Oceania. More than half the participants (n = 124, 54.2%) regularly treated patients with IEI, followed by occasional treatment (n = 77, 33.6%), or never (n = 28, 12.2%). Of the respondents, 14.8% reported that their countries performed NBS for IEI, whereas 42.2% reported their countries did not. T-cell receptor excision circles was the most widely used technique in some countries, with 75 (59.9%) for the diagnosis of NBS for IEI, followed by combined use with kappa deleting-recombination excision circles. Only 13 participants (10.3%) underwent neonatal exon screening in their respective countries. Financial and technical issues were among the major obstacles to the implementation of NBS for IEI. Conclusions: This pilot study showed that few countries have implemented NBS for IEI, despite the presence of immunology referral centers and the availability of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. The findings highlight the difficulties, mainly financial and technical, hindering wide application of NBS. Sharing experiences, technologies, and resources at the international level can help overcome these difficulties.

Keywords

• Newborn screening
• Inborn errors of immunity
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation