Microbial Cell (Jun 2018)

Methodologies for in vitro and in vivo evaluation of efficacy of antifungal and antibiofilm agents and surface coatings against fungal biofilms

  • Patrick Van Dijck,
  • Jelmer Sjollema,
  • Bruno P.A. Cammue,
  • Katrien Lagrou,
  • Judith Berman,
  • Christophe d’Enfert,
  • David R. Andes,
  • Maiken C. Arendrup,
  • Axel A. Brakhage,
  • Richard Calderone,
  • Emilia Cantón,
  • Tom Coenye,
  • Paul Cos,
  • Leah E. Cowen,
  • Mira Edgerton,
  • Ana Espinel-Ingroff,
  • Scott G. Filler,
  • Mahmoud Ghannoum,
  • Neil A.R. Gow,
  • Hubertus Haas,
  • Mary Ann Jabra-Rizk,
  • Elizabeth M. Johnson,
  • Shawn R. Lockhart,
  • Jose L. Lopez-Ribot,
  • Johan Maertens,
  • Carol A. Munro,
  • Jeniel E. Nett,
  • Clarissa J. Nobile,
  • Michael A. Pfaller,
  • Gordon Ramage,
  • Dominique Sanglard,
  • Maurizio Sanguinetti,
  • Isabel Spriet,
  • Paul E. Verweij,
  • Adilia Warris,
  • Joost Wauters,
  • Michael R. Yeaman,
  • Sebastian A.J. Zaat,
  • Karin Thevissen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2018.07.638
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 7
pp. 300 – 326

Abstract

Read online

Tuberculosis produces two clinical manifestations: active and latent (non-apparent) disease. The latter is estimated to affect one-third of the world population and constitutes a source of continued transmission should the disease emerge from its hidden state (reactivation). Methods to diagnose latent TB have been evolving and aim to detect the disease in people who are truly infected with M. tuberculosis, versus those where other mycobacteria, or even other pathologies not related to TB, are present. The current use of proteomic and transcriptomic approaches may lead to improved detection methods in the coming years.

Keywords