Cancers (Dec 2021)

Genomic and Molecular Profiling of Human Papillomavirus Associated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade Compared to Survival Outcomes

  • Hira Shaikh,
  • Julie E. McGrath,
  • Brittany Hughes,
  • Joanne Xiu,
  • Pavel Brodskiy,
  • Ammar Sukari,
  • Sourat Darabi,
  • Chukwuemeka Ikpeazu,
  • Chadi Nabhan,
  • Wolfgang Michael Korn,
  • Trisha M. Wise-Draper

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246309
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 24
p. 6309

Abstract

Read online

Recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients overall have a poor prognosis. However, human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated R/M oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is associated with a better prognosis compared to HPV−negative disease. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is the standard of care for R/M HNSCC. However, whether HPV and its surrogate marker, p16, portend an improved response to ICB remains controversial. We queried the Caris Life Sciences CODEai database for p16+ and p16− HNSCC patients using p16 as a surrogate for HPV. A total of 2905 HNSCC (OPSCC, n = 948) cases were identified. Of those tested for both HPV directly and p16, 32% (251/791) were p16+ and 28% (91/326) were HPV+. The most common mutation in the OPSCC cohort was TP53 (33%), followed by PIK3CA (17%) and KMT2D (10.6%). TP53 mutations were more common in p16− (49%) versus the p16+ group (10%, p p = 0.001), as well as non-oropharyngeal (non-OP) HNSCC patients (34 vs. 17 months, HR 0.551, p = 0.0001). There was no difference in the time on treatment (TOT) (4.2 vs. 2.8 months, HR 0.796, p = 0.221) in ICB-treated p16+ vs. p16− OPSCC groups. However, p16+ non-OP HNSCC patients treated with ICB had higher TOT compared to the p16− group (4.3 vs. 3.3 months, HR 0.632, p = 0.016), suggesting that p16 may be used as a prognostic biomarker in non-OP HNSCC, and further investigation through prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Keywords