Blood Science (Jan 2024)

Acupoint transplantation versus non-acupoint transplantation using autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells in treating peripheral arterial disease

  • Wenjing Guo,
  • Ling Pan,
  • Ruiyu Yang,
  • Jiali Sun,
  • Qinglin Hu,
  • Pingping Huang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/BS9.0000000000000175
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
p. e00175

Abstract

Read online

Numerous studies have discussed the therapeutic outcomes of using cell therapy or acupuncture to treat peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, there are no long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of transplanting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) via acupoints to treat PAD. We first reviewed the short-term and long-term clinical results of PAD patients treated with PBMNCs through intramuscular non-acupoint transplantation (control group; n = 45) or intramuscular acupoint transplantation (acupoint group; n = 45) at a single university hospital general medical center between December 2002 and September 2022. Pain intensity (assessed with the verbal rating scale [VRS] score) in the acupoint group was considerably lower than that in the control group at month 1 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 1.29 ± 0.96 vs 1.76 ± 0.82; P = 0.016) and month 3 (mean ± SD: 1.27 ± 0.90 vs 1.61 ± 0.86; P = 0.042). We observed significant improvement of VRS score (P < .001 for all) and ankle-brachial index (ABI; P < .001 for all) from baseline in both groups at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60. The 10-year cumulative rate of major amputation–free survival (MAFS) was higher in the acupoint group as compared to the control group (81.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.3%–94.1% vs 78.5%, 95% CI: 66.7%–92.3%; P = 0.768). Compared with the routine injection method, intramuscular transplantation of PBMNCs via selected acupoints could significantly decrease the short-term pain intensity in patients with PAD, which remains an option for consideration.