Treatment optimization of pelvic external beam radiation and/or vaginal brachytherapy for patients with stage I to II high-risk Endometrioid adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multi-institutional analysis
Wenhui Wang,
Lijuan Zou,
Tiejun Wang,
Zi Liu,
Jianli He,
Xiaoge Sun,
Wei Zhong,
Fengju Zhao,
Xiaomei Li,
Sha Li,
Hong Zhu,
Zhanshu Ma,
Shuai Sun,
Meng Jin,
Fuquan Zhang,
Xiaorong Hou,
Lichun Wei,
Ke Hu
Affiliations
Wenhui Wang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Lijuan Zou
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Tiejun Wang
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital Affiliated by Jilin University
Zi Liu
Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University
Jianli He
Department of Radiation Oncology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Xiaoge Sun
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University
Wei Zhong
Gynaecological Oncology Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
Fengju Zhao
Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital
Xiaomei Li
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital
Sha Li
Department of Radiation Oncology, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
Hong Zhu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University
Zhanshu Ma
Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University
Shuai Sun
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Meng Jin
Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Fuquan Zhang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Xiaorong Hou
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Lichun Wei
Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University of PLA (The Fourth Military Medical University)
Ke Hu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Abstract Background For stage I to II high-risk endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients, the optimal adjuvant radiotherapy modality remains controversial. The present study sought to optimize the treatment of pelvic external beam radiation (EBRT) with/or vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) for high-risk endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients in multiple radiation oncology centers across China. Methods This article retrospectively reviewed stage I to II patients with resected endometrioid adenocarcinoma treated at 13 radiation centers from 1999 to 2015. Patients were eligible if they had high-risk features (stage IB Grade 3 disease or stage II Grade 1–3 disease) on the basis of ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk group consensus. Results A total of 218 patients were included. Fifty-one patients received EBRT, 25 patients received VBT, and 142 patients were administered EBRT combined with VBT. The three groups were comparable in baseline characteristics, except the proportion of stage IB and Grade 3 disease in the VBT group was significantly higher and their age was older. Survival analysis showed that OS, DFS, LRFS and DMFS were significantly different among the three groups. Two out of three groups were compared with each other, and results demonstrated that DFS, LRFS and DMFS were worse in the VBT group than in the EBRT or EBRT + VBT group. The 3-year OS rates were 95.2, 85.2 and 95.1% in the EBRT, VBT and EBRT + VBT groups, respectively (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference in survival outcomes between EBRT group and EBRT + VBT group. A propensity matching analysis was performed to eliminate group differences. The results demonstrated that DFS and LRFS were significantly improved in the pelvic radiation group compared to the VBT group. Distant failure accounted for most of the failure patterns. Patients in the VBT group had significantly increased local and regional recurrence rates than patients in the EBRT or EBRT + VBT group. Acute and chronic radiation-induced toxicities were well tolerated for all patients. Conclusion For patients with postoperative stage I to II high-risk endometrioid adenocarcinoma, compared with VBT alone, radiotherapy modalities including EBRT significantly improved DFS, LRFS and DMFS with tolerable adverse effects. Overall survival was not significantly different between EBRT and EBRT + VBT modalities.