Patient Preference and Adherence (Aug 2024)

Medication Adherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Extent and Impact of Side Effects

  • van de Steeg BJW,
  • Esselink AC,
  • de Wit HAJM,
  • Kramers C,
  • van den Bemt BJF

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 18
pp. 1779 – 1788

Abstract

Read online

Bas JW van de Steeg,1 Anne C Esselink,2 Hugo AJM de Wit,1 Cornelis Kramers,1 Bart JF van den Bemt3 1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the NetherlandsCorrespondence: Bas JW van de Steeg, Department of Clinical Pharmacy A16, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, the Netherlands, Email [email protected]: Arterial and venous thromboembolism are a leading cause of mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are highly effective in both stroke prevention and prevention of venous thrombotic events. Medication adherence is a prerequisite for optimal protection against thromboembolic complications. Recent studies have shown that good adherence cannot be taken for granted by DOACs. In this cross-sectional study adherence among DOAC users was investigated and associations between beliefs about medication, perceived side effects and adherence were explored.Patients and Methods: We included 100 randomly selected adult DOAC users visiting one of the two participating Dutch community pharmacies in the summer of 2020. The self-reported adherence (primary outcome) was assessed with the Medication Adherence Rating Scale-5 (MARS-5) using three different cut-off scores. Beliefs about DOACs were assessed with the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire Specific (BMQ-S), while side effects and side effect burden were assessed with a self-developed questionnaire based on the Lareb Intensive Monitoring (LIM) system.Results: Of the participants, 9% reported non-adherence on the primary MARS-5 cut-off score < 24. For the MARS-5 scores < 23 and < 25 non-adherence percentages of, respectively, 3 and 33% were calculated. Associations were found between adherence and both side effects and side effect burden, regardless of the MARS-5 cut-off score. Bruising and minor bleeds were the most reported side effects (both 20%). For all patients, the necessity beliefs outweighed the concern beliefs. No associations were found between adherence and either gender, indication, DOAC or dosage.Conclusion: This study confirms that adherence in patients on DOACs cannot be taken for granted. High necessity beliefs do not guarantee good adherence, as side effects impair adherence even in patients having high necessity beliefs. Therefore, we recommend that both physicians and pharmacists evaluate both adherence and side effects with these patients on a regular base.Plain Language Summary: The issueThrombosis affects many people. Complications like stroke and lung embolism are a major cause of health damage, disability and even death. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are highly effective drugs at preventing these complications. However, patients need to take their medication properly to get the best protection. Recent studies showed that not all patients consistently take their DOACs.What’s new?In this study, we discovered that patients experiencing bothersome side effect were less likely to stick to their medication schedule. The most common side effects reported were bruising and minor bleeding, by 20% each. There were no differences in how well patients took their medication based on gender, medical condition, type of DOAC or prescribed dosage. Most patients believed their medication was necessary for their health.Why is this important?This study shows that side effects hinder patients taking their medication correctly even when they believe their medication is necessary for their health. This means that patients on DOAC therapy who experience side effects may be less protected against stroke and lung embolism. Therefore, we recommend that doctors and pharmacists regularly check in with patients about any side effects they experience and how consistently they take their DOACs.What’s next?This study highlights the importance of developing, testing, and implementing practical tools to find and help patients who do not take their DOACs correctly, to ensure they are better protected against blood clots.Keywords: DOACs, compliance, MARS-5, beliefs, BMQ-S

Keywords