Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences (Mar 2024)

Implications of EMG channel count: enhancing pattern recognition online prosthetic testing

  • Ann M. Simon,
  • Ann M. Simon,
  • Keira Newkirk,
  • Laura A. Miller,
  • Laura A. Miller,
  • Kristi L. Turner,
  • Kevin Brenner,
  • Michael Stephens,
  • Levi J. Hargrove,
  • Levi J. Hargrove,
  • Levi J. Hargrove

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1345364
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionMyoelectric pattern recognition systems have shown promising control of upper limb powered prostheses and are now commercially available. These pattern recognition systems typically record from up to 8 muscle sites, whereas other control systems use two-site control. While previous offline studies have shown 8 or fewer sites to be optimal, real-time control was not evaluated.MethodsSix individuals with no limb absence and four individuals with a transradial amputation controlled a virtual upper limb prosthesis using pattern recognition control with 8 and 16 channels of EMG. Additionally, two of the individuals with a transradial amputation performed the Assessment for Capacity of Myoelectric Control (ACMC) with a multi-articulating hand and wrist prosthesis with the same channel count conditions.ResultsUsers had significant improvements in control when using 16 compared to 8 EMG channels including decreased classification error (p = 0.006), decreased completion time (p = 0.019), and increased path efficiency (p = 0.013) when controlling a virtual prosthesis. ACMC scores increased by more than three times the minimal detectable change from the 8 to the 16-channel condition.DiscussionThe results of this study indicate that increasing EMG channel count beyond the clinical standard of 8 channels can benefit myoelectric pattern recognition users.

Keywords