Critical Care Explorations (Jan 2024)

Insertion Site Dilemma: Rethinking Radial Arterial Catheter Placement for Device Resilience

  • Timothy R. Spencer, RN, APRN, BHSc, Dip.App.Sc., Int. Care Cert., VA-BC,
  • Guglielmo Imbriaco, RN, MSN, CEN

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001037
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
p. e1037

Abstract

Read online

The study by Marie et al (2023) discusses their outcomes regarding the distance of radial arterial catheters from the radiocarpal joint and its association to device failure, although authors found no significant difference in failure rates between catheters inserted proximally or distally to the radiocarpal joint. However, other recent studies have reported that catheters inserted more distally are more likely to fail, with rates high as 25%. Factors that contribute to failure include poor site selection, infection, device occlusion, or dislodgement. With reliance on accurate hemodynamics from arterial catheters, providers should be aware of the risks and take steps to minimize them, as catheter failure is more than just associated infection, the inability to aspirate blood or a useable arterial waveform. Optimal insertion location, use of ultrasound-guided techniques, appropriate securement, and close monitoring of the catheter, along with accurate reporting of failure reasons, will help clarify future research outcomes.