Results of Arthroscopic Treatment of Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Depending on the Type of Hip Deformity

Abstract

Background. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is one of the most common causes of pain syndrome and limited mobility in the hip joint among young and middle-aged individuals. The aims of this study: 1) To evaluate the impact of the type of hip joint deformity in patients with FAI on treatment outcomes; 2) To identify the type of hip joint deformity that is optimal for correction using arthroscopy; 3) To determine the impact of the acetabular structure in conditions of borderline dysplasia on the treatment outcome. Methods. A retrospective uncontrolled single-center study was conducted, including 121 patients (135 hip joints), among them 49 (40.5%) women and 72 (59.5%) men. Patients were divided into four groups based on the type of deformity. The first group included 33 (24.4%) joints with cam-type FAI, the second group — 72 (53.4%) joints with mixed-type, the third group — 17 (12.6%) joints with dysplasia (LCEA-O25°) and cam-type deformity of the femoral head-neck junction, and the fourth group — 13 (9.6%) joints with a combination of dysplasia, cam-type deformity, and retroversion of the acetabulum. All patients underwent physical examination and radiographic diagnostics. In patients with borderline dysplasia, the version of the acetabulum was additionally assessed. The iHOT-33 and HOS scales were used to evaluate the preoperative status and postoperative results. Results. The best treatment outcome was achieved in the first group of patients, which was statistically significantly different from the results in the third group. The treatment outcomes in the second group of patients did not show statistically significant differences from the first group according to the HOS questionnaire, but differed according to the iHOT-33 scale. The treatment outcomes in the fourth group of patients were almost indistinguishable on the iHOT-33 scale from the first group and on the HOS scale from the second group. In the third group, a statistically significant result on the HOS-Sport subscale was achieved in only 30% of patients, while in other groups it was not less than 58%. Other scales showed a slight superiority of treatment results in the first and fourth groups compared to the second and third groups. In the first years after surgery, all groups of patients showed a significant improvement in sports activity, but after 2 years, there was a tendency for a decrease in patients in the second and third groups. Conclusion. The highest results of arthroscopic treatment were shown by patients in the first group with isolated cam-type deformity, slightly worse were results by patients in the second group (with mixed-type). In patients with borderline dysplasia, the effectiveness of arthroscopy depended on the structure of the anterior wall of the acetabulum. The worst result was observed in patients with borderline dysplasia and insufficiently developed anterior wall of the acetabulum — in that group of patients, it is worth preferring isolated periacetabular osteotomy or in combination with arthroscopy.

Keywords

• femoroacetabular impingement
• hip arthroscopy
• acetabular dysplasia
• acetabular retroversion