Plants (Jun 2024)

Effects of Essential Oils on Biological Characteristics and Potential Molecular Targets in <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i>

  • Júlia A. C. Oliveira,
  • Letícia A. Fernandes,
  • Karolina G. Figueiredo,
  • Eduardo J. A. Corrêa,
  • Leonardo H. F. Lima,
  • Dejane S. Alves,
  • Suzan K. V. Bertolucci,
  • Geraldo A. Carvalho

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131801
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 13
p. 1801

Abstract

Read online

Spodoptera frugiperda control methods have proved to be inefficient, which justifies the search for new control measures. In this search for botanical insecticides for controlling S. frugiperda, the following were evaluated: (i) the toxicity of essential oils (EOs) from Cinnamodendron dinisii, Eugenia uniflora, and Melaleuca armillaris; (ii) the effect of EOs on life table parameters against S. frugiperda; (iii) the chemical characterization of EOs; and (iv) the in silico interaction of the chemical constituents present in the three EOs with the molecular targets of S. frugiperda. The EO from E. uniflora had the lowest LD50 (1.19 µg of EO/caterpillar). The major compounds bicyclogermacrene (18.64%) in C. dinisii and terpinolene (57.75%) in M. armillaris are highly predicted to interact with the octopamine receptor (OctpR). The compound 1,8-cineole (21.81%) in M. armillaris interacts mainly with a tolerant methoprene receptor (MET) and curzerene (41.22%) in E. uniflora, which acts on the OctpR receptor. Minor compounds, such as nerolidol in C. dinisii and β-elemene in E. uniflora, are highly ranked for multiple targets: AChE, MET, OctpR, and 5-HT1. It was concluded that the EO from E. uniflora negatively affects several biological parameters of S. frugiperda development and is promising as an active ingredient in formulations for controlling this insect pest.

Keywords