Frontiers in Immunology (Jun 2023)

Second-line therapy for patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Chengxin Luo,
  • Chengxin Luo,
  • Xiangtao Huang,
  • Xiangtao Huang,
  • Ling Wei,
  • Ling Wei,
  • Guixian Wu,
  • Guixian Wu,
  • Yarui Huang,
  • Yarui Huang,
  • Yaqun Ding,
  • Yaqun Ding,
  • Zhen Huang,
  • Zhen Huang,
  • Jieping Chen,
  • Jieping Chen,
  • Xi Li,
  • Yunding Zou,
  • Yunding Zou,
  • Shuangnian Xu,
  • Shuangnian Xu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1211171
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveSteroids-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a life-threatening condition in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but the optimal second-line therapy still has not been established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of different second-line therapy regimens.MethodsLiterature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and China Biology Medicine databases were performed to retrieve RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of different therapy regimens for patients with SR aGVHD. Meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager version 5.3. The primary outcome is the overall response rate (ORR) at day 28. Pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with the Mantel-Haenszel method.ResultsEight eligible RCTs were included, involving 1127 patients with SR aGVHD and a broad range of second-line therapy regimens. Meta-analysis of 3 trials investigating the effects of adding mesenchymal stroma cells (MSCs) to other second-line therapy regimens suggested that the addition of MSCs is associated with significantly improvement in ORR at day 28 (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01–1.32, P = 0.04), especially in patients with severe (grade III–IV or grade C–D) aGVHD (RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.04–1.52, P = 0.02) and patients with multiorgan involved (RR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.05–1.55, P = 0.01). No significant difference was observed betwwen the MSCs group and control group in consideration of overall survival and serious adverse events. Treatment outcomes of the other trials were comprehensively reviewed, ruxolitinib showed significantly higher ORR and complete response rate at day 28, higher durable overall response at day 56 and longer failure-free survival in comparison with other regimens; inolimomab shows similar 1-year therapy success rate but superior long-term overall survial in comparison with anti-thymocyte globulin, other comparisons did not show significant differences in efficacy.ConclusionsAdding MSCs to other second-line therapy regimens is associated with significantly improved ORR, ruxolitinib showed significantly better efficacy outcomes in comparison with other regimens in patients with SR aGVHD. Further well-designed RCTs and integrated studies are required to determine the optimal treatment.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022342487.

Keywords