PLoS ONE (Jan 2012)

Small molecules with similar structures exhibit agonist, neutral antagonist or inverse agonist activity toward angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

  • Shin-ichiro Miura,
  • Yoshihiro Kiya,
  • Hiroyuki Hanzawa,
  • Naoki Nakao,
  • Masahiro Fujino,
  • Satoshi Imaizumi,
  • Yoshino Matsuo,
  • Hiroaki Yanagisawa,
  • Hiroyuki Koike,
  • Issei Komuro,
  • Sadashiva S Karnik,
  • Keijiro Saku

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037974
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 6
p. e37974

Abstract

Read online

Small differences in the chemical structures of ligands can be responsible for agonism, neutral antagonism or inverse agonism toward a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Although each ligand may stabilize the receptor conformation in a different way, little is known about the precise conformational differences. We synthesized the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan, R239470 and R794847, which induced inverse agonism, antagonism and agonism, respectively, and then investigated the ligand-specific changes in the receptor conformation with respect to stabilization around transmembrane (TM)3. The results of substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies support the novel concept that ligand-induced changes in the conformation of TM3 play a role in stabilizing GPCR. Although the agonist-, neutral antagonist and inverse agonist-binding sites in the AT(1) receptor are similar, each ligand induced specific conformational changes in TM3. In addition, all of the experimental data were obtained with functional receptors in a native membrane environment (in situ).