Revista Agrogeoambiental (Mar 2020)

Comparison of nonlinear models for the description of carbon mineralization in soils treated with pig slurry

  • Gustavo Sérgio de Paula,
  • Edilson Marcelino Silva,
  • Thais Destefani Ribeiro Furtado,
  • Ariana Campos Frühauf,
  • Joel Augusto Muniz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18406/2316-1817v11n420191412
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

One of the strategies to reduce environmental impacts caused by pig slurry is its application to soils for agricultural productions. Carbon mineralization curves can be used to determine the best periods for the use of organic matter for an adequate management of soils and growing plants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fit of nonlinear models for soil carbon mineralization. The experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with four replications and four treatments. The treatments consisted of monthly applications of pig slurry at rates of 0, 7.5, 15.0, and 30.0 m3 ha-1 ofpig slurry. Soil samples were collected and incubated for 26 days; then, seven observations of mineralized carbon volume were made over time. The description of the carbon mineralization followed the Stanford and Smith, Cabrera, and Juma models, considering the structure of autoregressive errors AR (1), when necessary; the fits were compared using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The description of carbon mineralization in the treatments by nonlinear models was, in general, adequate. Juma was the most adequate model to describe the treatment with rate of 0. Stanford and Smith was the most adequate model to describe the treatments with rates of 7.5 and 15.0 m3 ha-1. Cabrera was the most adequate model to describe the treatment with rate of 30.0 m3 ha-1.

Keywords